NY Times - In the race for Governor, all sides agree on the need for change
Friday, April 21, 2006
(The New York Times)COLUMBUS, Ohio, April 14 - In a state where the
governor has been caught up
in a corruption
scandal and where the only thing leaving faster
than
manufacturing jobs is young people,
candidates for governor are jockeying
for
the mantle of reform.
"The zeitgeist is
clear," said the likely Democratic nominee, Ted
Strickland, a six-term congressman, before
a packed room of donors the other
day at a
bar in downtown Columbus. "People in this state
want change.
They're tired of scandal. They
want to turn things around, and that's just
what we are going to do."
The next
day, at a breakfast gathering of young
professionals, the
front-runner in the
Republican primary, Secretary of State J.
Kenneth
Blackwell, sounded a similar
note.
"We rank 47 in job creation," he
said. "Venture capital has increased around
the country by about 10 percent but dropped
in Ohio by the same amount.
We've fallen on
real bad times, and I want to change
that."
Ohio is widely viewed as a
bellwether for the 2008 presidential contest.
No
Republican has ever won the presidency
without carrying the state, and many
Democrats say the first step to larger
ambitions is to break the 16-year
Republican hold on the governor's mansion.
Primaries for governor will be
held on May
2.
Polls give Mr. Strickland a slight
edge over either Mr. Blackwell or the
other
Republican candidate, State Attorney General
Jim Petro. But pundits
are keeping a
particularly close eye on Mr. Blackwell, who,
in an effort to
unify fiscal and religious
conservatives, is melding his strong opposition
to abortion and same-sex marriage with an
aggressive plan to control state
spending.
An African-American, he also hopes to win black
votes that usually
go to
Democrats.
For their part, the Democrats
hope to cash in on growing frustration with
Republican scandals in Columbus and
Washington.
"The governor's race is
going to be the Democrats' first real test of
their
'culture of corruption' argument,
which they're using in races throughout
the
country," said John C. Green, director of the
Ray C. Bliss Institute of
Applied Politics
at the University of Akron. "It may not work
everywhere,
but if it's going to work
anywhere, it's going to be Ohio."
Term
limits forbid Gov. Bob Taft's re-election,
though the chances he would
have run
otherwise are uncertain at best: Mr. Taft, son
of a United States
senator, grandson of
another and great-grandson of President William
Howard
Taft, pleaded no contest in August
to charges of failing to report thousands
in gifts to him.
The charges stemmed
from an investigation of Mr. Taft's friend
Thomas Noe, a
coin dealer and prodigious
Republican fund-raiser who in the past has
contributed to both Mr. Blackwell and Mr.
Petro. In February, Mr. Noe was
charged
with stealing at least $1 million from a coin
investment that he
managed for the Ohio
Bureau of Workers' Compensation, and his trial,
which
promises to keep the scandal on
voters' minds, is scheduled for
August.
"We've had an inept,
incompetent, corrupt and sometimes criminal
political
leadership," Mr. Strickland said
at the recent fund-raiser, "and in '06,
with your help, we will give Ohio back to
the people of Ohio."
Another issue is
demographics and the economy. State officials
estimate that
Ohio has lost more than
175,000 manufacturing jobs in the last 10 years
and
that an average of 65 people ages 25 to
39 leave the state every day. Mr.
Strickland says he wants to make Ohio more
competitive through investments
in
broadband networks, and has proposed using
unspent federal welfare money
for a
$50-million-a-year expansion of state-financed
preschool.
The congressman, an ordained
Methodist minister, also says his experience
representing a conservative district makes
him equipped to move Ohio into
the blue
column.
His Democratic opponent, former
State Representative Bryan E. Flannery, is
trailing him by more than 40 points in the
polls. But so far Mr.
Strickland's biggest
asset has been the acrimonious battle unfolding
between
the Republican candidates, whose
war chests are nearly as full as his. [On
April 20, the secretary of state's Web site
said Mr. Strickland had raised
$4.1 million
since January of last year, Mr. Blackwell $3.8
million, Mr.
Petro $3.4 million, and Mr.
Flannery $146,000.]
A former college
football player, Mr. Blackwell is an imposing
figure who
seasons his speeches with
references to his up-from-poverty past. ("And
who
would have imagined that the kid whose
job it was to say 'peanuts here, get
your
fresh roasted peanuts' in front of the stadium
would one day become a
partial owner of the
Cincinnati Reds?")
Mr. Blackwell leads
Mr. Petro in the polls by about seven points
and has
been hammering him in speeches and
television advertisements, saying that he
has failed to offer a plan to control
spending and that he only recently
became
an opponent of abortion.
Mr. Petro, the
state auditor for eight years before becoming
attorney
general, replied in an interview:
"Ken Blackwell's claims are just goofy.
I've always been a reformer, and I've been
the one promoting real
cost-saving methods
while his office was spending far in excess of
any other
in the state."
Mr. Petro
has proposed eliminating 11,500 state employees
through attrition
and early retirement, a
step he says would save about $1 billion a
year.
That money would be used, he says, to
reduce in-state tuition at Ohio's
public
universities, which is about 50 percent higher
than at public
universities in neighboring
states. He has also tried to win over
evangelicals in recent weeks by running
advertisements in which, holding a
Bible,
he talks about his faith.
Further, he
has won endorsements from the state's largest
newspapers, mostly
in reaction to a
proposed constitutional amendment, offered by
Mr.
Blackwell, that would limit annual
state and local spending increases to 3.5
percent or the sum of the rates of
inflation and population growth,
whichever
was higher. Critics, including Senators Mike
DeWine and George V.
Voinovich of Ohio,
both Republicans, say this would straitjacket
state and
local governments' ability to
finance needed programs.
Mr. Petro has
proposed an alternative amendment, which he
says would not
affect local governments, to
limit state tax revenue to 5.5 percent of
Ohioans' personal income.
Whatever
the endorsements, "Blackwell has a formidable
grass-roots and
church backing," said Dr.
Green, the Akron political scientist, who
estimates that 25 percent of Ohio voters
are Christian conservatives. "The
test will
be whether he can get them all to the polls
now, and again in
November."
